Development of a Public Database on Biotech Companies Using AI

The current version of the database, as reported by XXX, is in excellent shape and ready for use by the YYY community. I propose we make this database public while simultaneously working on Version 2 (V2) to support broader access and engagement.

Vision for V2 Development
The goal of V2 is to build on the existing structure by:

  • Expanding the number of companies listed

  • Updating and enriching information on current entries

  • Tailoring data collection through feedback from the Bits in Bio users community

  • Launching monthly surveys (initially) and later shifting to a quarterly cadence to guide content updates

On Peer Review
While I see the long-term value in peer reviewing, I am cautious about implementing it at this stage due to its resource-intensive nature. I recommend we take an iterative approach and consider introducing peer review in V4. Key concerns to address before launching peer review include:

  • Defining transparent evaluation criteria for reviewers to ensure consistency and reduce bias

  • Accounting for the dynamic nature of startups (e.g., funding, trials, partnerships) in the review structure

  • Identifying ways to incentivize reviewers, possibly through recognition

  • Deciding whether reviews should be anonymous or public, weighing the risks, especially for early-career professionals

  • Exploring funding opportunities, potentially through partnerships with VC funds, to support this process without burdening the Bits in Bio team

Immediate Next Steps

  1. Launch a dedicated Slack channel focused on AI and life sciences companies

  2. Share the current database widely to raise awareness and encourage engagement

  3. Assess user interest and develop key personas (e.g., VCs, job seekers) to guide feature prioritization

  4. Identify technical requirements for further development and recruit volunteers with relevant expertise, such as upvoting and downvoting companies

  5. Explore funding sources to support ongoing development

  6. As an alternative to peer reviews, I propose V3 to include brief founder interviews covering: 

    • Current pipeline

    • Five-year vision

    • Unique value proposition and problem addressed

Next
Next

Denali Therapeutics: Strategic and Valuation Analysis of Lead Asset DNL151